Of all the topics I cover on my blog, non-negotiable boundaries tends to push the most buttons—for betrayed partners and unfaithful spouses alike.
Betrayed partners sometimes mis-use non-negotiables to gain a sense of safety or control. Or they use them as a way to avoid the painful work of self-soothing, self-care, and the difficult (and messy) process of boundary-setting in relationships impacted by serial infidelity.
To be clear: You cannot establish a boundary for another person. An adult cannot tell another adult what they will—or won’t—do. You can make requests, and the person to whom you make the request can agree, disagree, or negotiate a compromise agreement.
A non-negotiable (relationship) boundary* says:
If __________ happens, I can no longer stay in this relationship.
I need _________ in order to stay in this relationship. If _________ doesn’t happen, I can no longer stay in this relationship.
Note that neither of these statements requires an action on the other person’s part. It is simply a statement of what the person stating the non-negotiable boundary will do if certain actions do—or don’t—happen.
As the unfaithful spouse, you are probably confused, frustrated, and perhaps even infuriated about your partner’s non-negotiable boundaries. And if your partner doesn’t understand the way non-negotiables work, or uses them as a weapon, you may have very understandable reasons for feeling the way you do.
Unfortunately, most unfaithful spouses see themselves as victims of their partner’s non-negotiables—further adding to the problem. And when you see yourself as a victim, you’re going to feel resentful. And resentment leads to disconnection, pain, and eventually slips and relapses.
Here are some common perceptions—and misunderstandings—from the unfaithful partner’s perspective about non-negotiables:
My partner’s non-negotiable boundaries are one of the reasons we’re now getting divorced.
Is this really true?
If your partner presents you with a laundry list of non-negotiables like attending seven 12-step meetings a week or going to individual therapy every week for 5 years, or having a polygraph every 3 months for 3 years (see my article Verify for Trust for some excellent information about the use of polygraph in restoring relationships impacted by serial infidelity), then these boundaries—which are actually demands—required your participation.
As an adult, you have the ability to say that you are not willing to agree to these demands, or that you see them as a set up—because eventually even with good intentions one will likely be broken and if your partner follows through with her non-negotiables, the relationship will be over.
Betrayed partners use non-negotiable boundaries as a power play.
Sometimes, they do.
As I’ve said many times, it is often irresistibly tempting for a betrayed partner to want to establish a long list of non-negotiable boundaries for the purpose of feeling safer or to gain control. And sometimes they’re used with ill intent to punish or shame the unfaithful spouse.
Most addicts don’t have the ability to disagree with anything their partner tells them to do. Unfaithful spouses will say yes to almost anything.
Well, they actually do have the ability, but they make another choice.
And yet, it’s true that they often say yes to almost everything. But is it in the best interest of the unfaithful spouse? Or the betrayed partner? And if he/she agrees to everything, who is responsible?
These are painful questions. It is a simple fact that most of us have a tendency to see ourselves as the victim of our partner, and other people in general. When you agree or say yes to a request, you lose claim to victimhood. You have made a free choice as an adult, and you cannot be a victim when you are free to choose to agree, disagree, or to engage in a conversation of compromise.
When a relationship is on the line, unfaithful spouses feel compelled to say yes.
As an unfaithful spouse, you do need to engage in acts of contrition, but a “feeling” of being compelled is not the same as having no choice. To believe otherwise disempowers you, and makes you a victim.
People who struggle with addiction are not mature. Addicts are not adults.
Addiction does cause arrested development both intellectually and emotionally. However, an addict’s delayed development doesn’t exempt them from adult responsibilities, or give them license to show up in relationships as adolescents.
To think otherwise is the same as saying that a person who is not of sound mind—either due to medical issues or being under the influence of a substance—is not responsible for their boundary-less or even criminal behavior.
Believing that addicts are immature, and therefore not capable of standing up for themselves in the face of a betrayed partner’s demands—or even boundary-violating behavior—is a dangerous thought distortion and profoundly disempowering. Holding this view places the addict in the position of being a child to the betrayed partner, and this kind of parent-child dynamic in any relationship is toxic.
If you’re the unfaithful spouse, the best thing you can do to help yourself and your partner navigate the perilous journey between addicts and partners after discovery of sexual betrayal is:
- Get the most qualified guidance and support you can
- Give your partner a full disclosure, with polygraph (if she wants one)
- Be as transparent, honest, and forthcoming as you possibly can
- Do everything you can do to reduce shame and defensiveness
- Join, participate, and process your frustration and resentment in a community of support
*There are 2 types of non-negotiable boundaries: non-negotiable relationship boundaries and non-negotiable personal boundaries (regarding physical and/or sexual touch).
If you’d like to receive blog posts just as soon as they happen, enter your email address now in the Subscribe to Blog via Email form on the right of this page.
© Vicki Tidwell Palmer, LCSW (2017)
All submitted comments are subject to editing to protect confidentiality and maintain anonymity. Submitted comments containing profanity, offensive language, or otherwise objectionable material will not be published.